Pat McGrath Aphrodite Amour Divine Blush Duo Review & Swatches
Pat McGrath Aphrodite Amour Divine Blush Duo ($44.00 for 0.34 oz.) includes two shades of pink that look more different in the pan than they did in practice. Someone with lighter skin may see a stronger difference, though. They swirled together to create a light-medium pink with moderate, warm undertones and a mostly matte finish, though it was on the powdery side.
Aphrodite Amour (Left) is a light-medium pink with subtle, warm undertones and a matte finish.
FURTHER READING:
Formula Overview
for details on general performance and characteristics (like scent).
- Make Up For Ever B208 (P, $23.00) is more shimmery (95% similar).
- Kevyn Aucoin Pink Sand #2 (PiP, ) is more shimmery (95% similar).
- Anastasia Spoiled (LE, ) is more shimmery, cooler (90% similar).
- Zoeva PK030 (P, ) is more shimmery (90% similar).
- ColourPop Catch My Vibe (P, $12.00) is darker, cooler (85% similar).
- MAC Cheeky Chic (LE, $24.00) is cooler (85% similar).
- ColourPop At Frost Sight (LE, $12.00) is more shimmery, darker, cooler (85% similar).
- Too Faced Strobeberry (Blush) (PiP, ) is more shimmery, darker, cooler (85% similar).
These are likely to be very similar shades based on our duping algorithm.
Formula Overview
$38.00/0.34 oz. – $111.76 Per Ounce
The formula is supposed to be “featherlight, long-wearing” that “build effortlessly from sheer to subversive.” The blushes are available in two finishes–demi-matte and satin pearl–and range from more muted to more vivid in color. The biggest “downfall” of the formula was that it was rather pigmented than buildable, so one could use a lighter hand to get more buildable coverage, but I found I had to use a light to moderate hand to ensure I didn’t over-apply each shade.
The consistency was smooth, silky, and lightly creamy to the touch; it was a touch powdery in the pan but had more slip than most powder blushes on the market, but it was definitely a powder-based formula. The product applied well to bare skin as well as over foundation, as it diffused well along the edges without picking up base products.
The satin pearl finish was luminous but not overtly shimmery, so it did not emphasize my skin’s natural texture. They wore around nine hours on me before fading visibly.
Browse all of our Pat McGrath Divine Blush swatches.
Ingredients
TALC, MICA, CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE, DIMETHICONOL STEARATE, MAGNESIUM MYRISTATE, ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE, DIMETHICONE, TRIMETHYLSILOXYSILICATE, CAPRYLYL GLYCOL, PHENOXYETHANOL, HEXYLENE GLYCOL. (+/-) IRON OXIDE (CI 77491), YELLOW 5 LAKE (CI 19140), BLUE 1 LAKE (CI 42090), RED 28 LAKE (CI 45410).
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer)
at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable
to the product you’re purchasing, or the brand or retailer’s website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.
Aphrodite Amour (Right) is a light, more muted pink with warmer undertones and a semi-matte finish.
FURTHER READING:
Formula Overview
for details on general performance and characteristics (like scent).
- ColourPop Desert Rose (LE, $12.00) is more shimmery, darker, cooler (90% similar).
- Makeup by Mario Mellow Mauve (P, $24.00) is cooler (90% similar).
- Zoeva PK020 (P, ) is less shimmery, darker, cooler (85% similar).
- Catrice La Vie En Rose (P, $5.99) is more shimmery, darker, cooler (85% similar).
- ColourPop Enchanted Mirror (LE, $12.00) is less shimmery, darker, cooler (85% similar).
- LORAC Tinge (PiP, $23.00) is less shimmery, lighter, cooler (85% similar).
- Sydney Grace Mauve Delight (P, $9.00) is less shimmery, lighter (85% similar).
- Pat McGrath Aphrodite Amour (LE, $44.00) is less shimmery, cooler (85% similar).
- Wayne Goss Blushing (PiP, ) is more shimmery, darker, cooler (80% similar).
- Clinique Blush Pop (LE, $21.00) is more shimmery, cooler (80% similar).
Formula Overview
$38.00/0.34 oz. – $111.76 Per Ounce
The formula is supposed to be “featherlight, long-wearing” that “build effortlessly from sheer to subversive.” The blushes are available in two finishes–demi-matte and satin pearl–and range from more muted to more vivid in color. The biggest “downfall” of the formula was that it was rather pigmented than buildable, so one could use a lighter hand to get more buildable coverage, but I found I had to use a light to moderate hand to ensure I didn’t over-apply each shade.
The consistency was smooth, silky, and lightly creamy to the touch; it was a touch powdery in the pan but had more slip than most powder blushes on the market, but it was definitely a powder-based formula. The product applied well to bare skin as well as over foundation, as it diffused well along the edges without picking up base products.
The satin pearl finish was luminous but not overtly shimmery, so it did not emphasize my skin’s natural texture. They wore around nine hours on me before fading visibly.
Browse all of our Pat McGrath Divine Blush swatches.
Ingredients
TALC, MICA, OCTYLDODECYL STEAROYL STEARATE, DIMETHICONOL STEARATE, DIMETHICONE, TRIMETHYLSILOXYSILICATE, DIISOSTEARYL MALATE, CAPRYLYL GLYCOL, PHENOXYETHANOL, MAGNESIUM MYRISTATE, TIN OXIDE, HEXYLENE GLYCOL, ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE. (+/-) TITANIUM DIOXIDE (CI 77891), IRON OXIDES (CI 77491, CI 77492, CI 77499), RED 7 LAKE (CI 15850), BLUE 1 LAKE (CI 42090).
Disclaimer: Ingredient lists are as available by the brand (or retailer)
at the time of publishing. Please always check product packaging, if it exists, for the ingredient list applicable
to the product you’re purchasing, or the brand or retailer’s website for the most up-to-date ingredient list.